Virginia Tech Media Coverage: Extreme or Total Coverage?
Rarely is an event as throughtly covered as the Virginia Tech tragedy. Nearly every news web page is plastered with stories related to the event, making the idea of “total coverage” overwhelming for many. Here, we’ll showcase what many news sources are making of this event and give you some perspective on exactly how much coverage is too much. When students want news, CNN.com is still the ruling news source, and by far, the site has been the leader in coverage of this event. For example, the site has been cycling through images of victims for the past few hours:
Additionally, CNN has front page links to related stories, which almost completely take up the top stories area. These links were all consectutive on the listing, and one would be hard pressed to find an angle they havent covered:
-Tech victim’s family fights to tell his story
-Columbine survivor: Emotional roller coaster ahead
-When is it OK to put a student away?
-Virginia Tech student hears of friend’s death via IM
And, of course, someone trying to pin the blame on video games:
-Survey: Violent video games ‘exhilarating’ escapism
…While even the entertainment pages contain stories related to the shooting:
-1 of killer’s photos resembles movie image
Most news paper sites are tossing their attention toward the shooting, while allowing attorney general Gonzalez’s to fall at a close second. Boston.com has this headline and image as their front page, with the site clearly struggling for filler in their use of a “flip flop controversy” as the main regional story:
|
|
Virginia Tech aftermath
Classmates: Shooter was laughed atTheir accounts could shed light on Cho’s state of mind. (AP, 5:06 p.m.) |
Not surprisingly, the coverage of the shooting is more heavily covered by the American news papers than their foreign counterparts. At the same time, it’s still a breaking story, and with that as such, even the BBC.com front page is dusted with stories steming from the shooting. At this time, the breaking of the killer’s so called “video manifesto” is the front page story:
![]() |
Police ‘regret’ at killer’s video Officers probing the shootings at Virginia Tech say footage of killer Cho Seung-hui should not have been broadcast. |
This image was on the main page’s sidebar, with the caption:

Inside Cho’s mind
How Virginia Tech killer fits pattern of campus gunmen
Overall, the coverage of this event is certainly overwealming, and has certainly raised a lot of questions about tact and what proper journalistic practices are. If one looks at the evidence above, they can see that these things get out of hand faster than a fis full of jello. In the end, it’s up to the editor and the reader to decide what’s right and wrong, so what’s your opinion?





